Debate
add a link
Massive cut in workers' penalty rates: Just another win for 'bizonomics'
Massive cut in workers' penalty rates: Just another win for 'bizonomics'
|
|
Submitted
by 
ThePrincesTale
over a year ago
|
|
1 fan
| add comment |
I remember visiting this website once...
It was called Cut in penalty rates another win for 'bizonomics'
Here's some stuff I remembered seeing:
Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer View text version of this page Help using this website - Accessibility statement
When we look at all the crazy behaviour in the United States, we comfort ourselves that it couldn\'t happen here. Well, last week we took another step in that direction.
Why do blue-collar workers get so alienated and fed up they vote for someone as mad as Donald Trump? It couldn\'t be because, while America has waxed fat over the past 30 years, their pay has been stagnant in real terms.
Workplace reporter Nick Toscano contextualises the Fair Work Commission\'s announcement on Thursday that Sunday penalty rates paid in retail, fast food, hospitality and pharmacy industries will be reduced from the existing levels.
Aerospace engineering student Caroline Hamilton Smith says promotion in schools will lead to a greater awareness of engineering courses at uni.
Law firm Slater and Gordon reports a net loss of $425 million in the six months to December 31. (Vision courtesy ABC News 24)
Working in a similar fashion to Airbnb, WedShed helps link unique venues available to hire for weddings with couples looking to find a special place to tie the knot.
In 2017, is working on a Sunday really so much worse than working on a Saturday? Michael Pascoe comments.
Will consumers be smart enough to use new, cheaper credit cards coming out, or will they be caught by the "lazy tax?" Michael Pascoe comments.
Insurance company QBE announces a $1 billion share buyback ahead of expected retained earnings growth.
Asia\'s trawler fishing wars reach Australia
Drone footage showing hundreds of dead sharks fished by Chinese company Pingtan Marine Enterprise off the coast of East Timor is the latest example of a modern war on the high seas that is fast intruding into Australia\'s neighbourhood.
How have the top few per cent of US households captured most of the economic growth for three decades?
Three main reasons, which apply in varying degrees to us.
Women to bear the brunt of cuts to penalty rates
\'Not balanced or fair\': restaurant owners miss out on penalty rate cut
First, because globalisation and "skill-biased" technological change have produced a small number of winners and a large number of losers.
Second, because far from using the tax-and-transfers system to require the winners to compensate the losers we\'ve gone the other way, making the income-tax scale less progressive and tightening up on payment of benefits to people of working age.
Third, because although the economy has changed in ways that weaken organised labour, we\'ve doubled down, weakening legislative arrangements designed to reduce the imbalance in bargaining power between bosses and workers.
The unions have been weakened by the greater ease with which employers can move their operations overseas and by the technology-driven shift from goods to services.
Geoff Bannister, at his Potts Point cafe, was pleased with the reduction in Sunday penalty rates.
The legislative attack has focused on removing union privileges, weakening workers\' rights and weakening workers\' bargaining power by discouraging collective bargaining and favouring individual contracts.
In the US there\'s been a failure to raise minimum wage rates. Here, there\'s been a decades-long campaign to eliminate penalty rates for people working "unsociable" hours which, supposedly, are anachronistic.
Selina Young, a long-time hospitality worker, is concerned about changes to penalty rates.
The mentality that produced these developments is "bizonomics" – something that
like economics because it repeats buzzwords such as "growth" and "jobs", but isn\'t.
In Australia, micro-economic reform has degenerated into a form of rent-seeking that\'s saying the way to a prosperous economy is to keep business – the people who create the jobs – as happy as possible.
This bizonomics isn\'t new, of course, as attested by its slogan: What\'s good for General Motors is good for America.
As it relates to the labour market, the proposition is that the way to make things better for everyone is to make life tougher for the workers.
Pay them less, give them less job security in the name of greater "flexibility", acquiesce to business\'s ambition of making working life a 24-hour, seven-days-a-week affair, and we\'ll all be better off.
The flaws in that argument – and the price to be paid for playing this game for decades – are now more apparent.
For a start, the number of workers and their dependents far outnumbers the bosses and owners and their dependants. So if all you end up doing is transferring income from the workers to the bosses, far more people lose than gain.
Of course, that\'s never what we\'re promised. The promise is always that the loss to existing workers is justified by the gain to all the would-be workers who\'ll now get a job.
Trouble is, too often you end up with a lot of workers making a sacrifice with only a handful of would-be workers finding jobs.
The Fair Work Commission\'s decision to cut Sunday and public holiday penalty rates for workers in hospitality and retail is an experiment in trickle-down economics, based on faith rather than evidence.
That makes it like everything else on big business\'s "reform" agenda: the immediate benefits come directly to business – in the form of cheaper labour – but, not to worry, those benefits will trickle down to the rest of us, so in the end it will all be much better for everyone.
Do you wonder why the punters don\'t believe it and conclude simply that "the government" has cut wage rates to benefit its big business mates, thus adding to their disillusionment and willingness to vote for populist fringe parties?
As I\'ve explained before, the claim that lower penalty rates in retailing will lead to growth and jobs is – like the argument for protection – based on a fallacy of composition and the absence of "economy-wide" thinking.
The most likely effect is that total consumer spending remains little changed, but more of it\'s done on Sundays and goes on recreation and retail.
Plus an apartheid weekend, where the high-paid still get it, but the poor have to work.
A fearless prediction: now business has got some of the "reform" it\'s seeking, no one will ever bother to come back in a few years\' time and do a proper study to check whether all the promises we were given ever came to pass.
Forget the banks, they\'re amateurs compared with health insurers
No need for Celebrity Apprentice Mark Bouris to fire himself
QBE chief hit with $550k pay cut after relationship with secretary
90 days: The clock is ticking for Slater and Gordon\'s survival
Biggest fiasco in Oscars history as La La Land wrongly named winner
Trump\'s denial of the news does not make it fake
\'An opportunity I would never have got\': Lucinda leading the big exodus
Don\'t let Beijing push US around, warns former ambassador
Scarlett v Seacrest: The most awkward moments on the Oscars red carpet
Freeway traffic banked up for kilometres hours after truck fire
Tinder taking away brothels\' \'bread and butter\': owner
\'I have bawled and bawled\': Canberra\'s last \'Aussie pub\' closes
Missing Canberra man Joel Koppie found in Sydney
The bombshell that Rosie Batty didn\'t see coming
\'Get out there and do it\': Perth council ditches street verge rulebook
Three newly crowned WA Lotto millionaires yet to come forward
The future of WA\'s economy: Life beyond mining
Subscribe for unlimited access to news. Login to save articles.
read more
Related Links
| more links >> |
Sign In or join Fanpop to add your comment