#rekt

I wouldn't say it's bad or great so I chose the option good. I actually enjoy the A&O2 plot to the first because Romeo and Juliet-based plots are something I'm not a fan of. I think the first movie is better, but not when it comes to the main part of the plot.

Of course, A&O is the first movie to adapt that plot and I enjoy it, so I have to give it that much. I would chose A&O1 over any adaption of Romeo & Juliet any day of my life.

@katealphawolf3 horrible acting? how? almost all of the actors sounded exactly like the original cast. first time i saw A&O 2, i mistake the new actors with the originals. that's a thing sequels don't really do, but A&O 2 nailed it. also, i didn't find a scene in the movie where the acting got bad. sure there were a few bits where it could've been a little better, but the acting was really good, especially when talkin' about largely unknown actors.
also, i didn't find the plot to be boring at all. yea, it was simple with not a lotta twists and turns, but thanks to the good pacing, it really helped the movie move the plot forward. and while i do gotta admit that the animation of A&O 2 was kinda lackluster, it wasn't atrocious like you said. a few scenes in the movie really reminded me of the first one and the graphics for most of the part are okay. don't blame them, they had one hell of a tight-ass budget. there was nothing that they could do. but they did give us with the second movie, i'd say it was really good