What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Alpha and Omega what do u think of Richard Rich as a director?

10 fans picked:
he&# 39; s okay
he's okay
   60%
he&# 39; s great
he's great
   20%
he&# 39; s terrible
he's terrible
   20%
 TimberHumphrey posted over a year ago
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

7 comments

user photo
he&# 39; s okay
Kitsune32 picked he's okay:
He's not bad or anything, but I think Steve Moore might do a better job.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
Richard Rich? as in that rich cartoon named Richy Rich? If not then I don't know him... :P
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
he&# 39; s okay
LillyOmega2 picked he's okay:
^I'm disappointed in the animation of the third. It's too bright compared to the original and part 2. Yes, its more realistic but I liked how dark the color of the second was compared to the third.

Anyway, I think he did okay with the 2nd movie but terrible with the 3rd movie. Overall, I'd rather see the original directors back. It's hard to believe the director of Fox and the Hound & producer of the original Alpha and Omega made a movie as bad as Alpha and Omega 3.
posted over a year ago.
last edited over a year ago
 
user photo
he&# 39; s okay
TimberHumphrey picked he's okay:
A&O 3 is terrible for u, but its great for me
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
he&# 39; s okay
LillyOmega2 picked he's okay:
(This isn't me ranting again.) What did you like about A&O3?

All I liked about it was Magril (is it bad the only character I liked in the whole movie, because of the predictable dialogue and terrible character development, is the one who never talks?) and the cameo of Princess.
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
he&# 39; s okay
TimberHumphrey picked he's okay:
well the characters are lovable, the animation's improved, the story (even though weak) was told well, the jokes are funny, the dialogue's pretty good, it's enjoyable, it's entertaining and it has heart
posted over a year ago.
 
user photo
he&# 39; s okay
LillyOmega2 picked he's okay:
It always confuses me when people say the animation is better than the second. I understand the detail half of it, but I don't like how bright it was. Not even the original was that bright of color. I realize it's not as serious of a movie, but why made it so much brighter than the original?

That could be another reason why I didn't like it. I don't like movies that are entirely based around comedy and jokes. I prefer more serious movies like the first and second Alpha and Omega. I'd never thought about that as a reason I don't like it until now.

I was just expecting it to be more like the first or the second movie, so when it wasn't, I was kinda disappointed. It seems like with every series I watch, the third is what causes me to lose interest in a series. (All Dogs Go to Heaven 3 is another example; so is Ice Age 3. Those are the only two examples that I can remember now.)
posted over a year ago.